نشریه علمی سازه و فولاد

نشریه علمی سازه و فولاد

مطالعه عددی اثر اندرکنش سیال- سازه- خاک بر ارتعاش آزاد مخازن فولادی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار دانشکده مهندسی، مرکز آموزش عالی محلات، محلات، ایران
2 دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران
3 دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران
چکیده
زمینۀ پژوهش: مخازن فولادی روزمینی از سازه‌های حیاتی برای ذخیره‌سازی آب، نفت و سایر سیالات هستند و نقش مهمی در تداوم عملکرد زیرساخت‌های صنعتی دارند. با توجه به آسیب‌پذیری این مخازن در برابر زلزله و پیامدهای ناشی از نشت یا تخریب آن‌ها، بررسی و ارزیابی رفتار دینامیکی آن‌ها از اهمیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار است. هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، بررسی اثر شرایط مختلف خاک بر ویژگی‌های ارتعاشی، فرکانس‌های طبیعی و مشارکت جرم مؤثر مخازن فولادی حاوی سیال است.
روش پژوهش: در این پژوهش نتایج تحلیل ارتعاش آزاد مخازن فولادی استوانه‌ای مهارشده با استفاده از روش اجزای محدود و با درنظرگرفتن اندرکنش سیال-سازه-خاک بررسی شده است. سیال درون مخزن به‌صورت تراکم‌ناپذیر و محیط خاک زیر آن بدون جرم فرض شده است. مخازن فولادی در ابعاد واقعی و با استفاده از ضوابط طراحی لرزه‌ای استاندارد API 650 طراحی شده‌اند. قطر مخازن فولادی برابر ۳۰ متر و نسبت ارتفاع به قطر مخزن عریض و مخزن بلند (H/D) به‌ترتیب برابر ۰/۴ و ۰/۸ است. در مدل‌های اجزای محدود، سه نوع جزیرۀ خاک با ابعاد مناسب شامل لایه‌های سخت، متوسط و نرم در نظر گرفته شده است.
یافته‌ها: فرکانس‌های طبیعی، شکل مودها، ضریب مشارکت جرمی مودها و توزیع فشار هیدرودینامیک مود ضربانی مخازن به‌عنوان معیارهایی برای مقایسۀ پاسخ ارتعاش آزاد مخازن با و بدون درنظرگرفتن اندرکنش خاک-سازه محاسبه شده است.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان داد که درنظرگرفتن اندرکنش سازه-خاک، تأثیر بیش‌تری بر پاسخ ارتعاش آزاد مخازن بلند در مقایسه با مخازن عریض دارد. در ملحوظ‌نمودن اثر اندرکنش سازه-خاک، ضریب مشارکت جرمی مخزن بلند روی خاک نرم نسبت به حالت تکیه‌گاه ثابت (بدون اندرکنش سازه-خاک)، 33 درصد کاهش یافته است. نرم‌ترشدن خاک زیر مخزن منجربه کاهش محسوس فشار هیدرودینامیک وارد بر پوستۀ مخزن بلند در مقایسه با مخزن عریض شده است. در مخزن بلند با نرم‌ترشدن خاک زیر مخزن، توزیع فشار هیدرودینامیک تغییر قابل‌توجهی دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Numerical Study on Fluid-Structure-Soil Interaction Effect on Free Vibration of Steel Storage Tanks

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Saiid Sobhan 1
Taha Khaki 2
Fayaz Rahimzadeh Rofooei 3
1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Mahallat Institute of Higher Education, Mahallat, Iran
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Background: Aboveground cylindrical steel storage tanks are widely used for storing water, petroleum products, and other essential liquids, making them key components of industrial infrastructure. Because these structures are highly susceptible to seismic loading, their damage or failure during earthquakes can result in significant economic and environmental consequences. Therefore, understanding their dynamic behavior is crucial for ensuring their safe and reliable performance. In this context, the present study examines the effects of different soil conditions on the vibration characteristics, natural frequencies, and effective modal mass participation of fluid-filled steel storage tanks.
Methods: In this study, the results of free-vibration analysis of anchored steel cylindrical tanks are investigated using the finite element method while accounting for fluid–structure–soil interaction. The full-scale steel tanks were designed according to the seismic design provisions of the API 650 standard. The steel tank diameter is 30 meters, and the height-to-diameter ratios (H/D) for the broad and slender tanks are 0.4 and 0.8, respectively. In the finite element models, three soil mediums with appropriate dimensions, representing hard, medium, and soft soil layers, were considered.
Results: The natural frequencies, mode shapes, modal mass participation factors, and hydrodynamic pressure distributions of the impulsive mode were calculated using the free-vibration response of tanks with and without soil–structure interaction.
Conclusion: The results indicate that considering soil–structure interaction has a greater influence on the free-vibration response of slender tanks compared to broad tanks. When soil–structure interaction is included, the modal mass participation factor of the slender tank with a flexible foundation decreases by 33% compared to the fixed-base support condition. Softening of the soil beneath the tank leads to a significant reduction in the hydrodynamic pressure acting on the shell of the slender tank in comparison with the broad tank. In the slender tank, soil softening causes a notable change in the hydrodynamic pressure distribution. Accounting for soil–structure interaction in broad tanks reduces the amplitude of the modal shape function in the mid-height region of the tank shell, whereas its effect on the slender tank is negligible.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Steel Tank
Soil-Structure Interaction
Free Vibration
Finite Element Analysi
Hydrodynamic Pressure
[1] Fingas, M. (2022), "Above ground storage tank oil spills: applications and case studies", Gulf Professional Publishing.
[2] Niwa, A., and Clough, R.W. (1982), "Buckling of cylindrical liquid‐storage tanks under earthquake loading", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 10(1), pp.107–122.
[3] Buratti, N., and Tavano, M. (2014), "Dynamic buckling and seismic fragility of anchored steel tanks by the added mass method", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43(1), pp.1–21.
[4] Brunesi, E., and Nascimbene, R. (2024), "Evaluating the seismic resilience of above-ground liquid storage tanks", Buildings, 14(10), pp.3212.
[5] Housner, G.W. (1963), "The dynamic behavior of water tanks", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 53(2), pp.381–387.
[6] Haroun, M.A. (1983), "Vibration studies and tests of liquid storage tanks", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 11(2), pp.179–206.
[7] Amabili, M. (2008), "Nonlinear vibrations and stability of shells and plates", Cambridge University Press.
[8] Virella, J.C., Godoy, L.A., and Suárez, L.E. (2006), "Fundamental modes of tank-liquid systems under horizontal motions", Engineering Structures, 28(10), pp.1450–1461.
[9] Dodge, F.T. (2000), "The new dynamic behavior of liquids in moving containers", Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX.
[10] Barton, D.C., and Parker, J.V. (1987), "Finite element analysis of the seismic response of anchored and unanchored liquid storage tanks", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 15(1), pp.299–322.
[11] Malhotra, P.K., and Wenk, T. (2000), "Simple procedure for seismic analysis of liquid-storage tanks", Structural Engineering International, 3(1), pp.197–201.
[12] Hosseinzadeh, N., and Masoumi Goudarzi, A. (2008), "Evaluation of seismic failure modes and retrofitting methods for unanchored cylindrical steel tanks in an oil complex", Journal of Structure and Steel, 2(3), pp.25–34. (in Persian)
[13] Khoshnoudian, F., and Jalali, R. (2008), "Behavior factor of elevated reinforced concrete water tanks with shaft staging", Journal of Structure and Steel, 2(3), pp.35–47. (in Persian)
[14] Sobhan, M.S., Rofooei, F.R., and Attari, N.K.A. (2017), "Buckling behavior of the anchored steel tanks under horizontal and vertical ground motions using static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses", Thin-Walled Structures, 112, pp. 173-183.
[15] Sobhan, M.S., and Hosseini, P. (2022), "A study of the buckling behavior of above ground cylindrical steel tank under seismic loading", Civil Infrastructure Researches, 8(1), pp.21–34. (in Persian)
[16] Sobhan, M.S., and Dehghani, E. (2024), "Numerical study of buckling of steel storage tank under horizontal and vertical ground motions", Journal of Structure and Steel, 34(46), pp.19–29. (in Persian)
[17] Alemzadeh, H., and Shakib, H. (2017), "Numerical study on the response of steel ground tanks with free rocking motion under horizontal earthquake excitation", Journal of Structure and Steel, 10(20), pp.71–79. (in Persian)
[18] Virella, J.C., Godoy, L.A., and Suárez, L.E. (2006), "Dynamic buckling of anchored steel tanks subjected to horizontal earthquake excitation", Journal of Constructional Steel Research., 62(6), pp.521–531.
[19] API Standard 650 (2007), "Welded Tanks for Oil Storage" American Petroleum Institute.
[20] Wolf, J. (1985), "Dynamic soil-structure interaction", Prentice Hall, Incorporated.
[21] Cayci, B.T., Inel, M., and Ozer, E. (2021), "Effect of soil–structure interaction on seismic behavior of mid-and low-rise buildings", International Journal of Geomechanics, 21(3), pp.04021009.
[22] ASCE, (2022) "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-22", American Society of Civil Engineers.
[23] Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. (2013), "Seismic behavior of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction", International Journal of Geomechanics, 13(4), pp.409–420.
[24] ANSYS, I. (2012), "ANSYS Mechanical APDL Theory Reference ", ANSYS, Incorporated.
[25] Sadjadi, M., Fadaee, M., Ghannad, M.A., and Jahankhah, H. (2023), "Seismic performance of deformable rocking soil-structure systems subjected to pulse-type excitations", Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 27(12), pp.3290–3318.
[26] Malhotra, P. (2000), "Practical nonlinear seismic analysis of tanks", Earthquake Spectra, 16(2), pp.473–492.
[27] Kramer, S.L. (1996), "Geotechnical earthquake engineering", Prentice Hall, New York.
[28] Veletsos, A.S. (1984), "Seismic response and design of liquid storage tanks", Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems, pp.255–370.

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 11 تیر 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 17 تیر 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 17 تیر 1405
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 فروردین 1405